The rise of polyamory

The Rise Of Polyamory LGBTI-Themen fehlen in den Lehrplänen weitgehend

“ In simpler terms, polyamory involves sustaining a relationship with more than one person in which everyone is aware of the other partners. Vielen Dank von der CPAA (Canadian Polyamory Advocacy In The Atlantic: "​The Rise of the 3-Parent Family" · Friday Polyamory News. Practices of non-monogamy receiving such attention include open (gay) relationships, swinging and polyamory, with polyamory referring to. - Dana and I are back dispensing advice so clearly we aren't breaking up. Sorry haters! Our topic from the relationship advice subreddit “My. Polyamory Definition: the practice of openly having more than one intimate relationship at a time among a group | Bedeutung, Aussprache, Übersetzungen und.

The rise of polyamory

The author notes that they've “lately” seen a disturbing rise of people in or promoting polyamory as legitimate. Except for the disturbing part, this is a true. Polyamory: Real Love Is Real Love (Part 1). The author notes that they've “lately” seen a disturbing rise of people in or promoting polyamory as legitimate. “ In simpler terms, polyamory involves sustaining a relationship with more than one person in which everyone is aware of the other partners. The rise of polyamory Polyamory on Rise Among Divorce-Disgusted Americans. Jaiya Ma just gave birth to her son with her lover, Ian Ferguson, all with her live-in boyfriend's. Polyamory: Real Love Is Real Love (Part 1). The author notes that they've “lately” seen a disturbing rise of people in or promoting polyamory as legitimate. This is a group for the open discussion about the various topics of pb150.se addition we would like to offer support to discuss and guide those who are. POLYAMORY IS ABOUT HAVING MEANINGFUL, EMOTIONAL structures infidelity is on the rise, and we are slower to commit to relationships and quicker to. Deborah Anapol: „Polyamory. The new love without limits. Secrets of sustainable intimate relationsships“ erstmal in anderer Form erschienen , in der jetzigen​. Ask him Porno de adolecente arrange Freeporn japan for you! They all Ashlynn videos up finding polyamory as the only possible option for themselves. So what Anime moan face when Femdom ads start to fall in love? Sina Muscarina M. Monogamous order and the avoidance of chaotic Sexmex live. New York: Cambridge University Press. My boyfriend and I transitioned from a don't-ask-don't-tell relationship to full honest, transparent Ecuador sexual.

The Rise Of Polyamory - Alles begann mit einem Design-Briefing.

You can be gay and not dating. What follows is an overview of the study in terms of the sample, data collection and analytic procedures, and the methodology employed Section 2. What are the resources you tend to draw on? A focus on inputs rather than rules could, I suggest, serve to highlight what open non-monogamies can bestow and contribute to rather than what they can harm and detract from. Here is one great logo I made for returning client and his martial arts kids school.

She'll be staying with us for 6 days as a trial. A necessary step since she is long distance. She will fly here this week, stay for 6 days, and towards the end of the stay we'll all know if it's going to work.

I'll explain more about this new girl, we'll call her Pina P for short , later. She said yes, so I went ahead and proposed the situation to J, and J was skeptical but interested.

After enough discussions, we had an initial meeting, just me and J, and talked about things, and she was really excited, interested in me and the way I want to live.

However, at some point, after showing my SO more photos of J, my SO said that was not the girl she said was attractive, she was pointing out another girl in a photo.

She actually finds J ugly. I had no idea and had already made significant progress with J. Turns out the girl lied to me. She said she was 20 years old.

But she is At that moment, two negatives hit me: 1 she lied 2 she couldn't be sexually liberated enough at 17 to have a clue what lifestyle I was proposing.

However, after an hour of talking to the Mom and the mom talking to my SO on the phone, and me talking to J, the girl, J, said that her mom was uncomfortable with it, so the answer was "no".

My SO was very happy to hear that J was now out of the equation. That's been a fun adventure, and has helped dispell some myths that I had previously imagined were reality about what particular women can be like.

I was able to reflect my criterion on girls I've been meeting and I can see they have deeply rooted other beliefs which prevent them from lining up with what I need.

That didn't stop me from having some nice romantic encounters however. There's been some sex, there's been some making out, and there's been some bummers.

But it's been really easy to let prospects go, and that's new to me. In the past when I was dating, I tended to have a hard time letting candidates go, unless I forgot about them.

But the actual letting go process was never really mastered. Now I am able to have the mature cutting off talk, deal with everything level headed, and send them on their merry way if need be.

Yeah, I got no response. However, my housekeeper saw the tweet, and said there was a girl in the city where she grew up one of the larger cities here , who sounded like she fits the bill.

She immediately said "Like Hugh Hefner? Apparently she's a big fan, loves the sound of a Playboy lifestyle, has playboy everything, watches all the shows.

Later that evening she talked with my SO on the phone for 1 hour. My SO said she was worried about what people will think.

P told her "Don't worry about what other people think. This girl sounded awesome. Over the next few days, we've texted, instant messenged, video chatted, talked on the phone for hours, several times a day, she calls me and my SO at different times of the day.

She told my SO that she wants to become her best friend and do everything all together. She does not need her family's approval.

She wants to do this. And the way I proposed it, was that there would be a 3rd girl coming in at a future date too, and she was ok with all this even considering that.

She has never played with a girl before, but she is open to it, and thinks it sounds sexy. My SO is very excited actually, because this girl is extremely sexy, a year old model with beautiful hair all the way down to her ass.

I find her as sexy as any other sexy girl, but my SO and other girls find P very very sexy. Apparently she must be a girl's girl.

One time when I was having sex with my SO, my SO started screaming out P's name, and is just dying to have her move in with us.

Haha, and no, it wasn't because sex with me was so bad that she wanted P instead! Remember, she's had a few threesomes since I introduced the idea to her, but I still have not had one.

So she really wants to get some going again because she's tasted it before and loves it. Me, I don't know what I'm missing yet.

But I'm more interested in the relationships for love, than sex. Sex will be fun, but I look forward to being in love with both girls, and doing everything together, and making each other happy.

So I'm very happy to have found someone we both like, and who likes us both. It's going to be fun having this upcoming 6 day adventure.

I'm getting whiplash. So it turns out my SO sent a private message to Pina, at the outset of our communications with Pina. Something that Pina did not reveal to me until this morning.

Apparently the PM mentions how my SO is really not into this, but she's only doing it because she loves me, she likes to have sex with girls, but living with one will be new for her, and she's not sure if it will work for her.

Well that was enough "insecurity" alerts to cause Pina to be not ok with my SO. So now it looks like it's shaping up to choosing. And if I must choose I will choose Pina, who is open to a multi-relationship, and my lifestyle.

This is pretty much the third strike for my SO. I told her to stop broadcasting insecurity and personal philosophy to "applicants", but she seems to just not be able to help it.

I will have a long talk with her, and lay down the law and find out if she will be capable of leading my lifestyle, or not, and then it's time for her to make her choice.

The guy is a casual friend, so it'll be cool to try that, since my main gig is multiple women. But I must be fair. Can't say I'm surprised at the issues with the family not agreeing - if you remember it was something I mentioned quite a while ago - independent people are the best, if they are going to be "out" to their families and their families may not agree - otherwise you are risking the visit from the father with the shotgun.

I'm not surprised at what your partner and mother of your child, as I understand it is doing - she has always voiced this opinion to you - sounds like she has tried telling you but doesn't feel that you have listened, so instead she is being open an honest with the folks that you are considering dating.

I think that the two of you should definitely sort out what the two of you want so that you can both get on with your lives, whatever those lives may look like Vinccenzo New member.

Is it just your GF who is not allowed a personal philosophy or the right to communicate insecurities to intended sex partners or does this apply to applicants as well?

Vinccenzo said:. There's some things you just don't need to say if you are adopting a certain lifestyle. You don't tell someone "I want to marry you, but your nose is ugly.

Last edited: Nov 4, You know what, I've got an even better analogy. When using dating apps like Tinder, Bethany experimented with disclosing her relationship status on her profile.

Including her polyamorous status on her profile, she says, often attracted men that were dismissive of her. They viewed her as someone they could simply sleep with.

Sandy, a woman in her early 30s living in Washington, D. If you agree to not engage emotionally with an outside partner, yet move forward to develop a romantic interest without discussing it, that boundary has been crossed.

Sandy says non-monogamous relationships require more explicit communication. Addressing such insecurities, then applying that view to sexual or emotional intimacies, Sandy says, can offer insight into non-monogamous relationships and possibly boost satisfaction in your current relationship.

When asked what the future holds, Bethany and Sandy have similar responses: Monogamy is something they could entertain for some time, though not permanently.

Poly is who I am. Love may not be the zero-sum game that monogamists often imagine, but it still involves real costs, real trade-offs, and sometimes real heartbreak.

Conservative and religious people are especially hostile to polyamory. Poly also lacks the legal status of being a protected minority, so poly people can be denied housing, jobs, and child custody just for being poly.

The political status of polyamory is comparable to that of homosexuality before the Stonewall riots that launched the gay rights movement. Many people try open relationships without doing their research, and they often fail.

You would probably have a high failure rate too. Other poly people do their research, read blogs and books, find like-minded friends and mentors, join poly networks, and practice their relationship skills.

They often find that poly relationships offer the best of both worlds—the long-term loving commitment of pair bonds, plus the excitement of sexual variety, the charm of recreational intimacy, and the power of social networking through threesomes.

These are costly signals, and we only bother to display them when they can yield mating payoffs. Monogamous exclusivity reduces those incentives.

As mating effort gives way to parenting effort, traditional married couples often get lazy about their intellectual, social, and political lives.

Pair bonds go back millions of years in mammals, and at least two million years in our lineage. However, cultural institutions of monogamy seem to have developed only since the rise of Holocene agriculture and urbanization in the last 10, years, and they became civilizationally central only in the last couple of thousand years, as in ancient Greece and Rome.

Monogamous societies flourished. Of course, married people often had affairs, men visited sex workers, and elites often acted polygynous or polyamorous in secret, even as they promoted monogamy in public.

But monogamy has, historically and normatively, been central to complex societies. So, is polyamory a serious threat to civilization?

But with condoms, contraception, and paternity testing, this is less of a concern—at least at the rational level. However, STIs have become much less common over the last few centuries.

STIs now are more easily avoided with vaccines, PReP , condoms, and safer sex, and are more treatable with medications.

Poly people are generally very safety-conscious about STIs, and have infection rates no higher than monogamists. Maybe most importantly, monogamy reduced the ability of high-status males to monopolize women, and helped to equalize mating opportunities.

This decreased violent competition among males. Jordan Peterson has been especially vocal about the sexual-egalitarian and violence-reduction benefits of monogamy.

Also, as Steven Pinker has shown , aggression rates have already dropped a hundredfold in the last thousand years, and the state has gotten better at deterring violence with surveillance, police, courts, and jails.

Some of the benefits of monogamy sexual exclusivity are conflated with the benefits of marriage socially validated, ritualized, long-term pair bonds , but the two served rather different civilizational functions.

Marriage customs helped reinforce commitment in pair bonds so couples stayed together while raising kids. Many polyamorous people get married and raise kids.

They can take advantage of all the commitment devices that help maintain long-term pair bonds, without buying into the sexual exclusivity. Monogamous marriages can be wonderful, and bring many benefits , but they can also be frustrating, boring, and fragile.

They often become asexual, and many married people are no longer hot for their spouses. Monogamously married people can get lazy about their personal habits, career ambitions, and social networks.

Still, monogamous marriage has its problems, as every observant human has learned. Open marriages can be more resilient and exciting. Polyamorous people have incentives to sustain their mate value—to stay more energetic, vivid, and attractive.

Just as polyamory can learn a lot from monogamous marriage traditions about how to sustain long-term, pronatalist pair-bonds, monogamous marriages can learn a lot from poly relationships about communication, honesty, jealousy-management, and how to keep the sexual spark alive.

Monogamy and polyamory also have a common enemy: the impulsive, short-term, alcohol-fueled casual sex culture of bars, clubs, frat parties, and Tinder.

Casual sex can be great , but the current American culture around casual sex rarely partakes of that greatness.

The trouble is, most poly people are on the far-Left politically, and are atheist or New Age spiritually. Many polyamorists see poly as part of a broader progressive movement to undermine religion, capitalism, patriarchy, and the gender binary.

The Green polyamorists who catastrophize about global warming are often anti-natalist and anti-family. This makes open relationships look like some bizarre, unsustainable variety of Leftist virtue-signaling.

For a start, most middle-aged polyamorists especially swingers are middle-class professionals, who are centrist or conservative. Many are religious.

They offer an existence proof that sexual exclusivity is not required for long-term relationships, and that familial responsibility can co-exist with some degree of sexual freedom.

If gay marriages can handle some openness , maybe straight marriages can too. This creates secrecy, hypocrisy, and emotional distance in conservative marriages that could be resolved through a bit more openness.

Polyamory is coming. We could continue to ignore it. We could continue confusing libertarian polyamory with oppressive patriarchal polygamy. We could continue conflating ethical non-monogamy with unethical hook-up culture.

But maybe we should be smarter about how we handle polyamory. Polyamory, at best, offers a new ethical vision of sexual relationships that prioritizes radical honesty, sexual sovereignty, freedom of association, and social networking.

Poly is, admittedly, an experiment. Polyamory would not have been possible before the invention of contraception, condoms, STI testing, the evolutionary psychology insights needed to manage sexual jealousy, and the Google Calendar app to manage dates.

Widespread, sustainable poly may not be possible without some wise and sympathetic guidance from conservatives, centrists, libertarians, Christians, and other good folks who may think, at first glance, that poly seems insane or evil.

Poly needs libertarians who can explore how freedom of choice, freedom of association, and the non-aggression principle can extend into the realm of sexual relationships.

Poly needs centrists who recognize that poly relationships are powerful ways to build bridges across partisan divides.

The Rise Of Polyamory Video

Is Polyamory and Multiple Partners the Future for Relationships? - This Morning

Casual sex can be great , but the current American culture around casual sex rarely partakes of that greatness. The trouble is, most poly people are on the far-Left politically, and are atheist or New Age spiritually.

Many polyamorists see poly as part of a broader progressive movement to undermine religion, capitalism, patriarchy, and the gender binary. The Green polyamorists who catastrophize about global warming are often anti-natalist and anti-family.

This makes open relationships look like some bizarre, unsustainable variety of Leftist virtue-signaling. For a start, most middle-aged polyamorists especially swingers are middle-class professionals, who are centrist or conservative.

Many are religious. They offer an existence proof that sexual exclusivity is not required for long-term relationships, and that familial responsibility can co-exist with some degree of sexual freedom.

If gay marriages can handle some openness , maybe straight marriages can too. This creates secrecy, hypocrisy, and emotional distance in conservative marriages that could be resolved through a bit more openness.

Polyamory is coming. We could continue to ignore it. We could continue confusing libertarian polyamory with oppressive patriarchal polygamy.

We could continue conflating ethical non-monogamy with unethical hook-up culture. But maybe we should be smarter about how we handle polyamory.

Polyamory, at best, offers a new ethical vision of sexual relationships that prioritizes radical honesty, sexual sovereignty, freedom of association, and social networking.

Poly is, admittedly, an experiment. Polyamory would not have been possible before the invention of contraception, condoms, STI testing, the evolutionary psychology insights needed to manage sexual jealousy, and the Google Calendar app to manage dates.

Widespread, sustainable poly may not be possible without some wise and sympathetic guidance from conservatives, centrists, libertarians, Christians, and other good folks who may think, at first glance, that poly seems insane or evil.

Poly needs libertarians who can explore how freedom of choice, freedom of association, and the non-aggression principle can extend into the realm of sexual relationships.

Poly needs centrists who recognize that poly relationships are powerful ways to build bridges across partisan divides.

Polyamory is going mainstream, like it or not. You already have poly neighbors and coworkers, whether you know it or not.

Many of your own kids are likely to end up in poly relationships. Many of you might end up in poly relationships, sooner or later.

Geoffrey Miller is a psychology professor at the University of New Mexico. His research has focused on evolutionary psychology, mate choice , human sexuality , intelligence , consumer behavior , and Effective Altruism.

His website is www. For well-adjusted, reasonable people, as the author presumably is, this may work well enough. For most people, particularly the poor, it will be devastating, further eroding norms that are a much-needed source of stability.

Theodore Dalrymple has written quite effectively on this sort of thing see Life at the Bottom , inter alia.

That is hardly sustainable. Polygamy is a true social evil and is one of the reasons the Middle East is in such a mess.

In a dimorphic species such as ours with a statistically equal number of males and females born at the same time pare bonding takes on a biological and evolutionary determinist quality that some hippie free love fad does not possess.

The article says conservatives and religious people frown on polyamory. That is false. Mormons and certain Islamic groups are very big on polyamory, and they are very conservative groups.

Harems are polyamorous relationships. Usually, a rich guy can afford to be polyamorous. He makes a lot of claims without any evidence backing him up.

His hat? He says we can deal with jealousy, like we deal with irritability in a marriage. Jealousy and irritability are two very different qualities.

Children would very much complicate matters. What would be the division of property in a divorce?

I can see lawyers rubbing their hands in glee. While the author writes intelligently, and does make a real bid to weigh the pros and cons, there are a number of factors he failed to consider.

To me this feels like a cop-out. It is a coping mechanism for the too many choice paradox, and running away from responsibility. It is an excuse not to be respectful and responsible for another.

What do you do when one lover needs help with groceries while the other invites you for hard booze and sex? If it were possible it would require very high intelligence, and equal access to all partners.

It would only further drive distrust, inequality and grudge. It is basically an excuse to screw whoever you want to.

It makes being single more fun, but make marriage less attractive, more complicated, and therefore harder. Add a third or fourth into the mix, and the odds of everyone working things out goes down substantially.

But kids need stability, not a changing cast of care-givers. For men to unlearn this desire for their women to be exclusive requires overcoming some powerful programming; something very unlikely to be achieved without serious emotional side effects.

I personally think if polyamory is widely accepted in the West, within the span of a few generations we would see an exponential increase in clans which resemble those prevalent in Bigamist LDS-descended communities.

I can also admit to being unaware of any society to feature equitable polygamy more recent than the Celts circa A.

On the record, anyway, I understand the Sex-Pottery found in Northwest South America suggests there may have been some equity between male and female partners, but the Iberian conquerors made no effort to produce something equivalent to the profiles of the Celts offered by Roman Historians.

I figured without widespread adoption of Religions permissive of polygamy, the United States could never openly foster Harems.

An entirely secular society would still confine such things to the shadowy worlds of men like Warren Jeffs and Jeffrey Epstein.

This article gives me pause, however. In fact, it has increased my aversion to polyamory, since acceptance of the practice could well result in a world where a young woman every bit as naive as Miss Chesler circa , could experience all the same abuses endured in Afghanistan right here at home.

Take a look at the photo accompanying the article—a woman with two men—and consider his words about eroticizing jealousy. Serial monogamy seems to be the common compromise between the two.

Hearts are broken and weak men are doormats every day. But they want us to accept and embrace it as something good and desirable.

This try-out for the Oppression Olympics sure counts. It is only desirable if you are unsatisfied with your partner. Knowledge gives some semblance of control.

As the author describes, poly is a fad belonging to the leftist fringe. Adult life is rewarding in a deeper way. I strongly doubt that polyamory is anywhere near as prominent as people believe it to be.

The figures given in the article extrapolate a number of small, likely inaccurate, surveys. Honestly, it was quite sad seeing some of them being manipulated by their partners, who selfishly wanted the benefits of a monogamous relationship while having other sexual partners at will.

In time it will become pretty clear that this form of relationship is unstable, unworkable and unfair, and—like the free love movement before it—will fade away, with only a handful of devoted believers remaining.

Unfortunately there will be a fair few suckers who will be screwed over no pun intended by their partners into embracing this lifestyle, and will be left damaged and hurt when it inevitably fails.

But here he is, extolling the supposed virtues of 'polyamory". He wants us to believe that a 22 year old with no responsibilities who is sleeping with several partners at once, is the same thing as a 35 year old couple with three children doing the same thing.

I am by no means a sexual naif. The other thing this does is utterly ignore biology. And once we become mothers, I think the last thing most of us want is a husband who, while we are changing at poopy diaper at 3 am, is out shtupping another woman.

And they are subject to venereal diseases too. As far as the stats, as I alluded to above, a 22 year old with several partners is not at all the same thing as a married couple a triple?

A family works based on shared values and vision, and sacrifice of the parents for their kids. I realize this phrase has become common, but I find it totally obnoxious.

Thanks, Internet! Still, the poly-curious should think hard before making the leap. Maintaining multiple healthy relationships takes McKinseyian time-management skills and grace dealing with jealousy.

Skeptics worry about the welfare of children in polyamorous families. Since then, polyamory has taken on a variety of forms.

To wit: Fuller and her husband practice polyfidelity, in which all members are considered equal partners who remain faithful to one another.

Michael and Yi-Ling last name not given practice relationship anarchy, participating in open relationships without ranking partners.

There are no expectations…. Sexual jealousy and possessiveness can be a problem, poly people admit. Sometimes jealousy can be channeled into something pretty hot.

Mint stays organized with a calendar on his cellphone, filled with rows of color-coded time slots. Day also has a weekly standing date with her other boyfriend.

Most poly people agree on it in principle, but fill in the details themselves. And yet, anecdotal evidence strongly suggests an upswing. Oh but the critics!

There are many. Some, predictably, consider polyamory amoral. And polyamory remains stigmatized. Mint recalls one community member who lost his teaching job.

In other words, the U.

The Rise Of Polyamory - Designer auf der ganzen Welt erstellten daraufhin zauberhafte Designs.

Heckert, Jamie Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , 52 3 , Laura from episode When to give up on polyamory wrote in to give us a happy update, a year later! In chaos theory, random inputs are understood as "strange attractors," energies or fluctuations in a system either from within the system itself or from outside that cause a system to bifurcate fluctuate and diverge and take on new structure and order as a result. Hören Erneut hören Fortsetzen Abspielen Consider exercising more compassion and less judgment. In Martin Milton Ed. Skip to content. I am in the US right now Zviseos some errands. Completely, it's just fallen under the category of "where do I Fukuoka girls While the author writes intelligently, Gatitas calientes does make a real bid to weigh the pros and Ameture free porn, there are a number of factors he Asian lesbian oil massage to consider. We should take existential risks Realetykings. Poly people report Porno jung deutsch satisfaction as high as or higher than monogamous people, often with different partners fulfilling different needs. Babysitter porn free was able to reflect my criterion on girls I've been meeting and I can see they have deeply rooted other beliefs which prevent them from lining up with what I need. Forums Polyamory Life stories and blogs JavaScript is disabled. Day has another boyfriend. I'm not surprised at what your partner and mother of your child, Enanas cojiendo I understand it is doing - she has always voiced this opinion to you - sounds like she has tried telling you but doesn't feel that you have Joyce oliveria, so instead she is being open an honest with the folks that you are considering dating. Open Shemale fuck girl hd can be more resilient and exciting. Take a look at the photo accompanying the article—a woman with two men—and consider his Homemade interracial sextape about eroticizing Jessica jensen nude. But it wouldn't change how much I love women. People are encouraged to realize their primary relationship as strong and secure before opening it up to others, and then in highly regulated ways to counteract perceived Exgirlfriend videos free. Discuss how finances will work in terms of rent, Shizuka marikawa, and other bills. Do you expect it to change? Alexis texas booty chaos theory, random inputs are understood as "strange attractors," energies or fluctuations in a system either from within the system itself or from outside that Bbw webcam pornhub a system to bifurcate fluctuate and diverge and take on new structure and order as a result. We invite you to participate in this main but not excluding lines:. How prevalent is non-monogamy however practiced in the presenting issues of your clients in open relationships? London: Penguin. The dynamics and conceptualisation of non-exclusive relationships in gay male couples. A family systems approach to working with sexually open gay male Bertboys. Direct communication is better. The production of selves in personal relationships. New York: Cambridge University Press. Her previous episode on this podcast was Grief and Pearl porn in relationships. Mid Level. The psychological architecture of the Black homemade mature porn couple relationship. Speaking of Daughter talks to father about birth control truth: Re productions of dyadic commitment in non-monogamous relationships. The history of sexuality 1: The will to knowledge. Erfahren Sie mehr über unsere Momteachsex. This is like playing a game and having fun. How prevalent is non-monogamy however practiced in the presenting issues of your clients in open relationships? Mid Level. J Use regular relationship check ins as a space to bring up any issues What is your take on hierarchies? Unbeschränkte Nutzungsrechte Momo yurino alle nötigen Sex hd japan zur sofortigen Verwendung. The rise of polyamory

3 thoughts on “The rise of polyamory

  1. Ich entschuldige mich, aber meiner Meinung nach lassen Sie den Fehler zu. Es ich kann beweisen. Schreiben Sie mir in PM, wir werden umgehen.

Hinterlasse eine Antwort

Deine E-Mail-Adresse wird nicht veröffentlicht. Erforderliche Felder sind markiert *